We’re extending security in ways that turn ‘dumb pipes’ into intelligent sensors and enforcement points that are able to dynamically optimize protections as attacks are happening. But Juniper truly delivers on this vision. “Many vendors talk about Zero Trust and providing secure access end-to-end to address the dynamic nature of threats, especially with a largely remote workforce accessing the corporate network from home and the increase in IoT devices. VP of security business and strategy at Juniper Networks Samantha Madrid provided further insights on the company's latest additions to its security portfolio in a press release (opens in new tab), saying: No one should use Juniper/Pulse servers for anything, ever, and if they do they should never claim that they provide any kind of 'security'.The company's new VPN solution enables organizations to quickly achieve dynamic, flexible and adaptable connectivity on any device reducing risk by extending visibility and enforcement from client to cloud. Their software has been backdoored by the NSA, and they never gave an adequate response. Ps- As /u/Cheeseblock27494356 commented below, Juniper's security record is atrocious. I wonder if Juniper Secure Connect will be a less messy and stupid protocol than oNCP or Pulse. If you have any technical knowledge about this protocol, or even better if you can give us access to a server that supports it, or - best of all! - if you're interested in coding up support for it in a modern, multi-protocol, multi-platform client… please join in the conversation on issue #337 on GitLab. Okay, so anyway… users have started asking us to support this even-newer Juniper Secure Connect protocol. It supports IPv6, but in a mindbogglingly stupid way that defies the principle of a layered, encapsulated network protocol stack.Our support for Pulse is pretty good, except that we don't handle all of the authentication modes yet (there are a lot), and we don't support TNCC / Host Checker emulation for Pulse (but we do support it for oNCP). It's also really stupid, just totally different.

Most Pulse servers also support the older oNCP protocl, unless manually disabled.We had high hopes that the Pulse protocol would be less stupid than the oNCP protocol, but nope. The Pulse protocol (aka JunOS Pulse), a newer (and allegedly-but-questionably 'better') protocol. The oNCP protocol (aka Juniper Network Protect), the 'original' Juniper SSL-VPN protocol.Our support is very feature-complete, but this is a stupid messy protocol which Juniper seems to have given up on maintaining, so it doesn't support IPv6 (among other things). I'm one of the core developers of OpenConnect, the multi-protocol multi-OS VPN client.

Juniper networks vpn client